Data assimilation of surface displacements to improve
geomechanical parameters of gas
storage reservoirs
C. Zoccarato, M. Ferronato, G. Gambolati, P. Teatini
Dept. of Civile, Environmental and Architectural Engineering,
University of Padova, Padova, Italy
D. Bau'
Dept. Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
F. Bottazzi, S. Mantica
Development, Operations and Technology, eni S.p.A., San Donato Milanese, Italy
ABSTRACT
The geomechanical analysis of a highly compartmentalized reservoir is performed to simulate
the seafloor subsidence due to gas production. The available observations over the hydrocarbon
reservoir consist of bathymetric surveys carried out before and at the end of a 10-yr
production life. The main goal is the calibration of the reservoir compressibility cM, that is,
the main geomechanical parameter controlling the surface response. Two conceptual models
are considered: in one (i) cM varies only with the depth and the vertical effective stress
(heterogeneity due to lithostratigraphic variability); in another (ii) cM varies also in the horizontal
plane, that is, it is spatially distributed within the reservoir stratigraphic units. The latter
hypothesis accounts for a possible partitioning of the reservoir due to the presence of sealing
faults and thrusts that suggests the idea of a block heterogeneous system with the number of
reservoir blocks equal to the number of uncertain parameters. The method applied here relies
on an ensemble-based data assimilation (DA) algorithm (i.e. the ensemble smoother, ES),
which incorporates the information from the bathymetric measurements into the geomechanical
model response to infer and reduce the uncertainty of the parameter cM. The outcome from
conceptual model (i) indicates that DA is effective in reducing the cM uncertainty. However,
the maximum settlement still remains underestimated, while the areal extent of the subsidence
bowl is overestimated. We demonstrate that the selection of the heterogeneous conceptual
model (ii) allows to reproduce much better the observations thus removing a clear bias of
the model structure. DA allows significantly reducing the cM uncertainty in the five blocks
(out of the seven) characterized by large volume and large pressure decline. Conversely, the
assimilation of land displacements only partially constrains the prior cM uncertainty in the
reservoir blocks marginally contributing to the cumulative seafloor subsidence, that is, blocks
with low pressure.